Any committers have thoughts on this patch?
It looks like a reasonable patch to apply, but I wanted to double-check.
Why do you think it is reasonable?
Conor
Erik Hatcher wrote:
- [PATCH] Main.runBuild does not need to setSec... Stu Halloway (DevelopMentor)
- Re: [PATCH] Main.runBuild does not need ... Erik Hatcher
- Re: [PATCH] Main.runBuild does not n... Conor MacNeill
- Re: [PATCH] Main.runBuild does n... Erik Hatcher
- Re: [PATCH] Main.runBuild do... Conor MacNeill
- Re: [PATCH] Main.runBui... Stu Halloway (DevelopMentor)
- Re: [PATCH] Main.ru... Conor MacNeill
- Re: [PATCH] Mai... Stu Halloway (DevelopMentor)
- Re: [PATCH] Main.runBuild does not need ... Steve Loughran
- Re: [PATCH] Main.runBuild does not n... Stu Halloway (DevelopMentor)
- Re: [PATCH] Main.runBuild does n... Steve Loughran
