Conor - Re: this patch to 14295 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14295 I hadn't realized the others bugs you mentioned (14006,14208,14210) weren't in 1.5.2 either. My preference would be that all of them go into 1.5.2, but there may be some reason you guys have not to do that that I am unaware of. So my preference would be that they all go in. If that is impossible, then I guess I will have to be content to get them into 1.6. When is 1.6 scheduled to come out?
Re: we're all volunteers - I know and I salute you guys for all the work that you do! Nonetheless, for those of us who also would like to help but at a lesser level of commitment than you committers, there needs to be a better mechanism to get our contributions into the flow. In this case, you don't have StarTeam and have no ability to support these tasks. I do, and am glad to help, and this amount of time commitment suits my schedule (although not my wife's!) but these sorts of delays are an annoyance. The systemic mechanisms do not work very well. Unfortunately, "pitching a bitch" is more effective. That is a problem, although a small one in the scheme of things. Anyway, thanks, Conor. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:16 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: FW: starteam ant tasks Steve Cohen wrote: > Please! It has now been almost three months since this patch was > submitted. Can someone please commit it? Or reply to it? Or > something? > OK, committed to 1.6 but please refer to my notes regarding application to 1.5.2 > > It really isn't fair to volunteer programmers to make them wait this > long. > We're all volunteers :-) Conor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
