At 05:46 PM 2/12/2003, Erik Hatcher wrote:
What do you folks think? Where do we go from here with it?
How hard would it be to support adding the attributes and nested elements defined by parent classes? I'm thinking here in particular of all the tasks that are subclasses of MatchingTask. It would be nice if the documentation could be complete for these, indicating all allowed attributes and child elements for every task.
If that is too hard, at least a link to a documentation page for the superclass's elements and attributes would be helpful.