If you mean you're a future "tool vendor" in that you'll be writing your own custom 3rd party tasks, thats not quite what I meant. Or are you working on something bigger than that?

As for task writers - the xdocs idea is not something they need to be too concerned with - the @tags to utilize are minimal on purpose. The straightforward tasks, in fact, would not require any @tags at all. Only ones with exceptions like setters that are not to be exposed or a task name mapping that is different need tags to affect the generation process.

With <antdoclet> part of XDoclet now, the tool is available to everyone. Whether the module eventually should live with Ant or with XDoclet is up for discussion of course, but later :)

        Erik


On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 04:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a future "tool vendor" I am very interested in this thread
(how should documentation of task in the future be done).
I am working on a code generator which produces an initial code
skellet. It works for the code and the build file, needs some more
work for test code and HTML manual ...

But I don´t use Ant via GUI or introspection :-)

Jan Matèrne



Reply via email to