Jason,
My apologies. I wasn't trying to get at anyone - I was just keen understand the
discussion points, and express my own personal thoughts on the matter.
Stuart.
On Monday, January 15, 2001, at 09:39 AM, Jason Rosenberg wrote:
> Stuart,
>
> For the record, I really agree with you, and I have been on the
> side of arguing that Ant is and should be a scripting language,
> not the opposite, as you imply below....
>
> Jason
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stuart Roebuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 4:30 AM
> Subject: Re: Parameterized "task-function"
>
>
> I've tried looking back through the posts to clarify this one, but haven't found a
> reference.
>
> Jason, you mention that Ant isn't a scripting language, but don't explain why. I
>presume
> this is because there is an explanation
> somewhere of the argument for it not being a scripting language. Could you possibly
>refer
> me to it, or post it to me.
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stuart Roebuck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead Developer Java, XML, MacOS X, XP, etc.
ADOLOS http://www.adolos.com/
