> Let us know if this works.  Also try jikes, it's much faster then javac
1.2

Yeah, Javac 1.2 works as expected...
However, I would prefer Javac 1.3 because of the higher compilation speed
and I think the bytecode is a tad more optimized, too.

> > I mean, that behavior is a real blow. It makes Ant useless for my
> > (presumable
> > very common) purpose.
>
> I probably wouldn't blame ant for a problem that can be attributed to the
> compiler that you're using.

Okay, I apologize ;-)

Ingmar

Reply via email to