Okay, I've looked at the docs for Jaxp and I believe that I understand what needs to occur but I'm still falling short of the mark. I've added the following property declaration:
<property name="javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory">
<classpath>
<pathelement path="c:\bea\wlserver6.0sp1\lib\"/>
<pathelement location="weblogic.jar"/>
</classpath>
</property>
Unfortunately, the build still fails with a "FactoryConfigurationError". I noticed that both the weblogic.jar and ant\lib\jaxp.jar both implement the DocumentBuilderFactory. Is this causing the build to fail? If I remove the ant Jaxp.jar, the build immediately fails.
Any ideas?
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: WL 6.0 EJBC Ant build
This is because you don't have a parser set for the jaxp framework to work.
when you run ant define the property
javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory to point to the
DocumentBuilderFactory you want to use.
For me go and grab jax1.1 and look at the docs for the
newInstance methodo of DocumentBuilderFactory
-----Original Message-----
From: Schmoll, Brett x66244 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WL 6.0 EJBC Ant build
Does anyone have a working Weblogic 6.0 EJBC task that they could share with
me? I'm able to get the EJBC built from a command prompt but don't seem to
be able to get it to work under Ant. Here is the Taskdef I'm using, am I
missing the obvious?
<java
classpath="d:\develop\posse_jvm_4_3_1\temp\posse_jar;c:\jdk1.3\lib\tools.jar
;c:\bea\wlserver6.0sp1\lib\weblogic.jar;c:\weblogic\classes;"
classname="weblogic.ejbc" >
<arg path="d:\develop\posse_jvm_4_3_1\temp\header.jar" /> Do you
have
<arg path="d:\develop\posse_jvm_4_3_1\temp\header4_3_1.jar" />
</java>
I receive a "javax.xml.parsers.FactoryConfigurationError:" when this runs
under Ant. I run what I assume to be the equivalent from a command prompt
and it builds fine. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Brett Schmoll
