On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Larry V. Streepy, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not a JLS guru by any means, but I thought non-final references > had to be left as real references. True, but there is nothing like a non-final reference in an interface, see <http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/interfaces.doc.html#78642>: >> Every field declaration in the body of an interface is implicitly >> public, static, and final. It is permitted to redundantly specify any >> or all of these modifiers for such fields. So, even if you don't put the "final" into your source, the reference is final as far as Java is concerned. Stefan
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants Peter Donald
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
- RE: javac, depend, and interface constants Jason Pettiss
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants T Master
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants Nico Seessle
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants Peter Donald
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants Stefan Bodewig
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
- Re: javac, depend, and interface constants Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
