----- Original Message ----- From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:44 AM Subject: Re: Wrong sig for Ant 1.4?
> Timothy Shadel wrote: > > > Please let me know when you've found a solution as well. > > > > - Tim > > > > > >>>>Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/28/01 10:02AM >>> > >>>> > > Timothy, > > > > You got the same problem I got. Even better, you were using the GUI and PGP > > 7.0.2, and I was using the command line and PGP 6.5.8. > > > > Conor, I'm a little pressed for time right now to try and install GPG and > > check it out, but the sig should really work on both, shouldn't it? If you > > want to try and get it working on PGP as well, I'd be happy to be a guinea > > pig. If you want, send to my personal email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I check > > that more than the any list. > > > > - Chris > > OK, this is what I have found. I can verify the signature using gpg both > on Win32 and Linux. Conversely, PGP always indicates the signature is > bad. I tried many versions of the GUI version on Win32 and the command > line version on the jakarta.apache.org server. I'm not sure why this is. > > Anyway I have just posted a new 1.4.1 Beta release here > http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-ant/release/v1.4.1b1/ > > I generated this on Linux rather than Win32. I have still used gpg to > sign the files but pgp on jakarta.apache.org seems a lot happier with > these. Can you check those files out and let me know. > > Thanks > Conor > > >
