On Tuesday 05 February 2002 18:28 pm, Jon Skeet wrote: > > i'm a complete newbie to ant, but not a newbie user. i've > > just been given the > > task (no pun intented) of converting our company's make-based > > builds into ant > > (~2500 classes in 500-some-odd packages). i've searched high > > and low and can > > find no tool for generating a skeleton build.xml for an existing dir > > structure. > > Why should you need to? If your existing directory structure is > appropriate, you can have one short build file that builds everything. > > Which bit did you expect to be complicated?
The bit about adding the filenames to the file - but i must admit that i am *assuming* that that's part of the process (i was weened on make, so my mind-set is probably a bit broken when it comes to ant). i'd be happy to be wrong! Thanks for the quick response! ----- stephan Generic Universal Computer Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de Office: +49 (89) �552 92 862 Handy: �+49 (179) 211 97 67 This email is encrypted with ROT26 encoding. Decoding it is in violation of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
