--- Scott Ellsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, February 7, 2002, at 12:05 PM, Steve Holdener wrote:
>
> > Another approach that might require more effort would be to include
> > an indication of when a tast was introduced on each task's page. So
> > <condition> would have "Introduced: 1.4" or something.
>
> I like this a bit better myself, as then we can add mentions like
> "added 1.5 20020231" to the documents in progress,
I'd be worried about something like that getting out of control. It's not
only tasks that get introduced, but attributes and functionality as well.
And how do we police things to make sure the notes get added (we're having
enough trouble keeping up with copyright updates :)
I was just thinking of something like:
ANT USER MANUAL
Release 1.4.1
Seemed to me that anyone reading a doc with a release number on it
shouldn't be expecting any guarantees that anything documented in it would
be valid for any other release (backwards or forwards). Not that there
wouldn't a number of things that would in fact be valid -- just that
there's no guarantee they all would be. (Hey, if I'm reading a Perl5 book,
but I'm running Perl4... :)
Diane
=====
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
