"Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> standard practise is to use <available> to probe for a class you
> need; that decouples you from knowing where the class is
> implemented, then conditional <fail> if you really need that class
> to be there

Yes, but available is _very_ inconvenient, because you always define
two more targets: one that contains the available-task, and one that
is called depending on the available-set-property that does the
appropriate things.

-- 
Martin Monsorno
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to