You mean the one from Ant's FAQ? That particular class was a user
contribution, and I'm guessing its fair game. The BuildListener interface
is simple so not too much to that class.
If you've built something slick, why not contribute it back to the Ant
project?
Also, in Ant's CVS there is a MailLogger which is better than the
BuildMonitor class because it allows the output to come to the console and
mails the results too - and does not require you to use the -logfile switch.
Erik
----- Original Message -----
From: "Venkatesh Jayaraman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 3:31 PM
Subject: license issues with BuildMonitor
> Are there any license considerations with BuildMonitor that i've
extensively
> modified?
> For example, can i change the package name, put my company corporate
license
> agreement in the class, and include it in our production build source?
>
> thanks,
>
> -venky
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
