> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:22 AM
> To: Ant Users List
> Subject: Re: auto dependency generation?
>
>
> Daniel Barclay wrote:
>
> >
> > Wasn't someone asking about cases that <depend> doesn't cover
> > (that is, the few kinds of source dependencies not reflected
> > in class files, or new source dependencies)?
> >
>
>
> Not the original poster, but one reply mentioned the
> limitations of <depend>.
>
>
> > Theoretically at least, might there be a place for a full source
> > dependency checker? It would do a full dependency check on the
> > current source (instead of looking at class files with: 1)
> not-quite-
> > full and 2) not-quite-current dependency information).
> Yes, this would be great and could easily be accomodated in
> the current
> classfile structure as a new attribute type. Until then ...
Well, one has to dream occasionally, right? :-)
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
