On Monday, May 13, 2002, at 01:16 PM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> Haven't used the beta, but a wild guess would be to use
> <isset property="p" />
>
> instead of
>
> <isset property="${p}" />
>
> Dereferencing a property in a test for the existence of the property
> is a
> stretch ;-) --DD
Got it in one!
Thanks, Dominique, Diane.
The new "unless" behavior on the fail task is really cool. Made things
a lot shorter and clearer.
The only place I have duplicated functionality left now is in my jar
task, where I need to have a manifest block if I need a mainclass
declaration, but not if there is not.
The <manifest> element of the jar task taking the if and unless
attributes would do that for me.
Scott
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
