Anything network mounted? Especially all those jar files?
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Tara Hernandez
Sent: Tue 7/23/2002 3:10 AM
To: Ant Users List
Cc:
Subject: Re: Question about ant performance
I figured I was doing something wrong.
:)
I'm passing in a toplevel source dir, under which the classes
are finally divided up
into about 6 subdirs. My compile target looks a lot like it's
from the default ant
example, funnily enough:
<target name="compile" depends="init"
description="compiling java source" >
<javac srcdir="${src}" destdir="${build}">
<classpath refid="classpath"/>
</javac>
</target>
Don't know if this matters, but my classpath is constructed to
be fairly large,
somewhere around 76 thirdparty libraries. I know I can probably
weed this down
some, but will probably still end up with > 50. This is the
only thing I can think
of so far that might be causing problems.
"Hal Hildebrand (web)" wrote:
> Are you compiling individual files, or all the directories at
a time? We have
> 800+ classes spread over 5 source directories, and including
jarring and
> signing, our build takes under 2 minutes. This is with 1.4,
which seems to be
> significantly faster than 1.3, but not an order of magnitude.
The box is a
> 1.6 Ghz P4 under Win2K.
>
> So something you're doing is very wrong... Do you have an
example of the
> pattern you're following to compile?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tara Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > We're not talking a lot of directories here (at least in the
src tree). Is
> > there any thing that can help with this? If this can't be
redressed, it makes
> > Ant unusable for me.
> >
> > -Tara
> >
> > Diane Holt wrote:
> >
> > > --- Tara Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > With my first stab at a build.xml with Ant 1.5, the same
tree takes
> > > > something close to 25 minutes, with both cpus just
pegged for most of
> > > > the time and apparently not doing any actual
compilation, because it
> > > > only scrolls javac messages for the last couple of
minutes.
> > >
> > > Sounds like it's spending a long, long time in the
directory scanning.
> > >
> > > Diane
> > >
> > > =====
> > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
> > > http://health.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > "I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did.
I said I didn't
> > know"
> >
> > -Mark Twain
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
"I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did. I
said I didn't know"
-Mark Twain
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
