Hello Stefan,
I think what Dominique means is that there should be a delete
capability equivalent to the copy capability. for example...
This copy...
<copy todir="${src.dir}" >
<fileset dir="${src.dir}">
<present present="srconly" targetdir="${src.dir}">
<mapper type="glob" from="sample.*" to="*" />
</present>
</fileset>
<mapper type="glob" from="sample.*" to="*" />
</copy>
Should be equivalent to this delete...
<delete>
<fileset dir="${src.dir}">
<present targetdir="${src.dir}">
<mapper type="glob" from="sample.*" to="*" />
</present>
</fileset>
<mapper type="glob" from="sample.*" to="*" />
</delete>
one creates * files from sample.* files and the other deletes * files
that have a corresponding sample.* file.
Does that help make it clearer?
Jake
Monday, September 23, 2002, 9:01:21 AM, you wrote:
SB> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Shouldn't delete simply take a <mapper>, as does <copy>
SB> I don't think so, what would you use it for? Isn't the <present>
SB> selector (which accepts a <mapper>) all that is needed (sorry, I
SB> haven't followed the thread very closely)?
SB> Stefan
SB> --
SB> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SB> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Best regards,
Jacob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>