----- Original Message ----- From: "Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:46 AM Subject: RE: content based uptodate
> You mean a <selector>, right? Can you set the buffer size like in > <checksum>? This improved performance a lot I recall. Can you share it as-is > thru Bugzilla? Thanks, --DD yeah, a selector. I should just abuse my position and commit it, then let you do the tuning (actually its FileUtils that does the comparison) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:steve_l@;iseran.com] > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:10 PM > To: Ant Users List > Subject: Re: content based uptodate > > I have a not-yet-committeed patch to ant of a <different> mapper, that > compares content. If files have the same timestamp and size they are > considered equal, but if the timestamps are different we do a byte for byte > compare. > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
