did not do that at first look, coz I hoped that ant was kinda enough smart to not reload classes that had already been loaded by a previous javac task to fasten the build process. is this how this is supposed to happen when not forking and using antcall (or am just dreaming) ? seb.
Conor MacNeill wrote: > Sebastien BLANC wrote: > > using 1.3.1. I'll checkout the 1.4. > > keep posted. > > thanx. > > seb. > > > > You can also try forking the javac task - it will then leak in a separate VM :-) > > Conor > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
