Never had an issue with <copy> myself... I've heard many times on this forum that Windoze filesystems are often unreliable when it gets to get the *real* last modification time of a file (gives it with a 2 seconds tolerance), so that could throw <copy> off I guess, I guess never saw this problem myself.
--DD -----Original Message----- From: David McTavish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:35 AM To: 'Ant Users List' Subject: RE: copy problem sorry, <javac .../> <sleep seconds="3"/> <copy .../> I think there is a bug in copy, at least I've posted about this before about 4 months ago and had no successful advice. I ended up switching to the sleep command to get it to pseudo-work, but this depended on the speed of the processor running the ant process. I finally just switched everything over to cp.exe to be more reliable and haven't looked back since. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
