Maybe such immature comments are better left untyped, or at best, posted to a different newsgroup. You should, at the least, acknowledge the fact that they are still contemplating the use of ant, which, in my mind, is a HUGE compliment to the tool. I for one, would like to see ant's use become more "standard" within the industry, and NOT just for java development. The biggest drawback is that there isn't a lot of internal/core support for non-java development efforts, but with people having interest, maybe this will be addressed. I know we started using ant because it worked well with Java, but since, we've expanded to use it with our C++, VB, and java code. It would be nice, that when our development efforts MUST include (by customer demand) that we support the .NET framework, that we do not have to re-think our build methodology because of tool support.
d. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recommendations for moving from java to .NET > -----Original Message----- > From: Nau, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Recommendations for moving from java to .NET > > We are looking into shifting our component-based development > environment from java & j2ee to c# & .NET. HAHAHAHA. That's the best joke I've heard all day. Someone actually going TO .NET from Java/J2EE! HAHAHAHAHA. Wait... maybe he's serious? HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAH AHA Even funnier! Michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
