On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 03:33:42PM +0100, Sander Steffann wrote:
This proposal is a first step to catch low hanging fruit. Yes: there are many
things that can (should) be improved, but getting consensus on these
controversial topics is difficult. So the proposers are taking it one step at a
time. Based on the discussion on this mailing list those steps apparently have
to be very small, but at least there is the possibility of movement :)
Correctly and perfectly summarised. A textbook example of
early-stage frog-boiling.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog
The road to oppressive and onerous regulation is taken a small
step at a time in the 21st century and that's why it is important
to resist such attempts NOW while it is possible to do so without
great personal sacrifice.
For the avoidance of doubt, the above constitutes (continuing)
opposition to 2017-02.
rgds,
Sascha Luck
