In article <8a493c0.bf1cb7ed.16330c2a...@gmx.ch> you write: >Okay my "vast" majority was a bit misleading. I meant the majority of >users/companies already in whois :-) >So just the natural persons remain. But why should their right on their >private data not count?
Of course they count. But since they are an exception, a reasonable policy would publish the info for the 99% of domains registered by organizations and redact it for the 1% registered by people. It's not hard to do, the .CA registry has done it for years, which is well known to anyone who is familiar with this issue. Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
