Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------------------------

[NATO's chief academic apologist, along with Michael
Ignatieff, has the simple truth thrust right in his
face, so does what his type excels in: Lies.
His 'spirit of the staircase' evasive response after
the fact is just what one would expect from him. All
the fault for NATO's machinations in the Balkans and
the horrors they brought in their train is laid at the
feet of Yugoslavia, Slobodan Milosevic in the first
place, and now the evil "Macedonian Slavs."
If we're to believe Malcolm, there is some sort of
character deficiency in the Serbian and Macedonian
souls;  some lack of agape, perhaps, that prevents
them from appreciating the merits of their attackers,
both foreign and foreign-backed.
They're plagued by a primitive, atavistic instinct to
protect their homes, lands, persons when crime
syndiicate-linked terrorists attack them. Unlike
urbane, cosmopolitan Britons, for example.
So refined are certain Britons, Mr. Malcolm,
certainly, that they can revise their opinions and
positions effortlessly, gliding directly into
statements like, "Western governments acted over
Kosovo not because they cared about the Kosovars but
because they cared about Macedonia" - when he's trying
to get away from an enraged Macedonian.
Foolish consistency is the hobgoblin, etc., so he
reverses eveything he's said to date justifying NATO's
war against Yugoslavia in 1999.
It now turns out that the reason for NATO violating
the UN Charter and tearing up every scrap of
international law by launching an unprovoked war
against the people, infrastructure and environment of
Yugoslavia was not at all any concern for ethnic
Albanians in Kosovo  - except for such of them wearing
the KLA insignia and brandishing Kalashnikovs - but an
abiding solicitude for the well-being of Macedonia. 
How NATO has demonstrated its supposed concern for
Macedonia has been painfully evident over the past six
months, certainly to the Macedonians themselves. Hence
the rencontre that gave rise to Mr. Malcolm's
maunderings. 
With characteristic reserve, phlegm britannique,
Malcolm has chosen to withhold his startling insights
into the true cause of NATO aggression against
Yugoslavia until now; until a Macedonian official, no
doubt possessed of more than his quota of "hostile
Slav suspicion and prejudice," threatened to do to Mr.
Malcolm what you could sell lottery tickets for the
privilege of doing.
Speaking of selling tickets, book me a front row seat
in Pristina whenever Malcolm attempts to explain to
the likes of Agim Ceku and Ramush Haradinaj that he
couldn't care less about 'Kosovars' and all along has
only been concerned about Macedonia.] 

 

Sunday Telegraph
Nato must remain until the job is done
By Noel Malcolm
(Filed: 02/09/2001) 
NOT long after the end of the war in Kosovo, I was
returning from a visit there when I was stopped at
Skopje airport by a Macedonian official who recognised
my name. 
"So, you are a historian?" he asked. "Yes," I said
warily, sensing some hostility in his tone and bracing
myself for a disquisition on medieval history.
"Tell me this," he continued, "what is your historical
explanation for the wicked Nato aggression in Kosovo
to help Albanian bandits?"
I felt that this question was not asked in a spirit of
pure historical inquiry, but I gave it the best answer
I could.
I said: "The Western governments acted over Kosovo not
because they cared about the Kosovars but because they
cared about Macedonia. 
"They were afraid that if Milosevic's policy was not
stopped, it would have the effect of destabilising
your country. They acted to help you."
"What? What?" He was shouting now, and his eyes were
bulging; his colleagues had stopped what they were
doing and were all staring at us. 
Suddenly I had become the focal point of a Balkan H.
M. Bateman cartoon. I had a plane to catch; I made my
excuses, and caught it.
As British troops moved into northern Macedonia last
week, I found myself running over that conversation
again in my mind. The answer I gave was, I believe,
correct. 
Milosevic had driven more than 350,000 Albanians from
their homes in the year before Nato took action over
Kosovo. 
If the territory beyond Kosovo's borders had consisted
of endless expanses of vacant land, the Western powers
would have done little to stop a permanent
resettlement of the Kosovar population there.
But in fact that territory consisted of a small state,
containing a population of two million, a fragile
democracy and an uneasy modus vivendi between a Slav
majority and a minority (roughly one third) of
Albanians. 
An influx of a million Kosovo Albanians, permanently
unable to return to their homes, would have strained
Macedonia to breaking point. And a complete breakdown
of Macedonia, with a further bloody war, was the thing
the West most dreaded.
Do the events of the last six months - the gradual
onset of armed conflict between Albanians and Slavs in
northern Macedonia - mean that Nato got it wrong, and
that its intervention over Kosovo has actually brought
about the Macedonian war of its worst nightmares? 
Not really. Such a war has not happened yet, and there
is a good chance that it can be prevented. In any
case, there can be little logic in blaming that Nato
intervention for destabilising Macedonia, while at the
same time choosing to ignore the effects on Macedonia
that Milosevic's policies, unchecked, would have had.
Logic, unfortunately, is not the only thing that acts
on people's minds, as the case of that airport
official showed. 
The hostility towards Nato nursed by much of the
majority Slav population in Macedonia arises not only
from the feeling that this small country has been
pressured and arm-twisted by the West - a feeling
which is understandable enough. 
What it is mainly based on is a deep suspicion
towards, and prejudice against, the country's Albanian
minority.
The groups of Slav Macedonians who gathered in the
centre of Skopje on June 25 chanting the slogan
"Albanians to the gas chambers" were, no doubt, an
extreme case. 
Most Macedonians have never got worked up about
Albanians in the past; they had no reason to, as the
two communities led almost parallel lives, interacting
hardly at all. 
But at the back of many Macedonian minds there was
always the feeling that Albanians were alien and
inferior, and could not claim equal rights in their
country.
That feeling is what gives popular support to the
hard-line nationalist element in the Macedonian
government - centred on the minister of the interior,
Ljube Boskovski, who controls the special police. 
The same feeling, presumably, motivated the unknown
person who hurled the concrete block that killed
Sapper Ian Collins last week. 
When even the Macedonian government spokesman declares
that "Nato is not our enemy, but it is the big friend
of our enemies", we should not be surprised if teenage
thugs take that argument and simplify it a little
further.
There can be no doubt that the primary responsibility
for these last six months of fighting lies on the
Albanian side: it was Albanian rebels who took up
arms. Yet the most dangerous obstacle to peace now
lies on the Slav Macedonian side. 
The political agreement brokered by the Western powers
does satisfy the main demands of the Albanians, most
of whom have been fighting not for a change of borders
but for an improvement of their status within
Macedonia; but it leaves the Macedonian hard-liners
angry and resentful.
If (and it is a big if) the agreement is passed by the
Macedonian parliament and properly implemented, most
of the Albanian rebels will have no further wish to
fight. But implementation will take time. 
If Nato withdraws on the 30th day, Mr Boskovski will
send in his special police on the 31st day - as he has
promised - to reclaim "every last millimetre of
Macedonian soil". 
The fighting will restart, and we shall discover, not
to our surprise, that the Albanians have kept a few
weapons after all.
So there is good news and there is bad news. The good
news is that Armageddon has not come yet to Macedonia,
and need not come at all. 
The political agreement can prevent it, if followed
through in good faith. The bad news is that some Nato
deployment - though not necessarily a British one -
will have to stay there for many months to come.
Nato did not bomb Kosovo for fun two years ago; it had
strong reasons for wanting to prevent the collapse of
Macedonia. Those reasons are no less strong today.
Noel Malcolm is the author of Kosovo: A Short History
 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com

-------------------------------------------------
This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been 
shut down

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: [email protected]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================



Reply via email to