Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK --------------------------------------------- I'm not sure a legalistic approach is what we need. The US administration clearly thinks it can make the law, and nobody's pulling it up on it. The sub-text to all this is that the only superpower got a bloody nose and isn't going to examine UN resolutions, let alone Blackstone's Commentaries, before trying to salvage its pride with some ultra-violence. Steve Kaczynski ___________________________________________________ >From: Bill Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; >Subject: Can NATO invoke 'at war' clause if no country has been named? >[WWW.STOPNATO.ORG. >Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 03:20:52 +0100 > >Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK >--------------------------------------------- > >Dear One and All, > >Can NATO invoke the 'at war' clause if no specific >country has been named? > >Legally, > >Bill. > >------------------------------------------------- >This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com >that has been shut down > > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------------------------- This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been shut down ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email was sent to: [email protected] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
