Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------------------------

Krasnaya Zvezda

September 18, 2001

FIRST WAR OF THE 21ST CENTURY

The United States is not ready to fight internationl terrorism The US
government is drawing the wrong conclusions from this tragedy

Author: Yuri Pankov

[from WPS Monitoring Agency, www.wps.ru/e_index.html]

RELYING ON ITS NATO ALLIES, THE UNITED STATES HOPES TO BE ABLE TO 
DEFEAT TERRORISM ALL ON ITS OWN. LIKEWISE, IT HOPES TO CREATE A WORLD 
TO SUIT ITSELF. WASHINGTON STILL HOPES TO BE ABLE TO TAME TERRORISTS 
AND USE THEM IN FUTURE AGAINST ITS REAL OR IMAGINED ENEMIES.

     Several years ago, analysts began to note an increase in the 
numbers of terrorist groups, their size, development of military 
power, and more extensive contacts between them. These assumptions 
were subsequently confirmed when Arab instructors were found to be 
working with guerrilla detachments in Chechnya, and Chechen 
mercenaries in Kosovo; when the flows of money circulating in the 
world of international terrorism were uncovered.
     Washington and some Western capitals apparently drew inadequate 
conclusions at the time, resolving to use the factor of terrorism to 
promote their own goals. First Kosovo and then Macedonia were chosen 
for implementation of the Western theory of "controlled terrorism". 
Terrorists received moral and material support in both cases. Albanian 
terrorist organizations in Yugoslavia even coordinated their actions 
with NATO aviation.
     Russia found itself under unprecedented pressure because of the 
counter-terrorist operation in Chechnya. Emissaries of Chechen 
guerrillas were received in Washington and European capitals, while 
Moscow was threatened with international sanctions. The West was even 
suspected of manipulating the Taliban in order to undermine what 
stability there was on the southern borders of Russia and the CIS.
     It soon became clear that there could be no such thing as 
"controlled terrorism". As soon as terrorists spread their wings, they 
turn against their former patrons. It happened in Kosovo, and 
something similar is now happening in Macedonia. What happened in the 
United States last week is best described by the relatively new term 
"terrorist attack". Some analysts don't rule out the possibility that 
the terrorist attacks in New York City and Washington are just the 
start of a bona fide terrorist war against the United States.
     The US Administration is also talking about a "war" nowadays. 
However, judging by Washington's intention to use bombs against 
terrorists, it appears that the United States doesn't understand what 
kind of war this is going to be. Analysts, including American 
analysts, say traditional weapons and methods typical of conflicts of 
another generation cannot be effective against large-scale terrorism.
     "All too frequently, criminal infrastructures cannot be destroyed 
by our high-precision weapons systems," said General Wayne A. Downing 
of the US special forces, long before the events of September 11. "As 
a rule, these gangs don't have fixed locations and the criminals live 
in densely-populated areas under the guise of ordinary citizens. It is 
there that they hide weapons and ammunition. The use of high-precision 
weapons systems will only result in numerous civilian casualties, 
while the criminals will not be affected." Downing was referring to 
Israel. Short of personnel, Israel could not maintain effective 
control over the security zone in southern Lebanon, from which 
Hezbollah was launching missiles. In desperation, Israel opted to try 
high-precision weapons systems. The results are well known: numerous 
casualties among noncombatants and condemnation of Israel by the 
international community. The terrorists received further confirmation 
of their own immunity.
     If the United States now follows suit, the international support 
it presently has will soon fade. Much will be recalled: Hiroshima and 
Nagasaki, Vietnam, Iraq, Yugoslavia... The air strikes against 
Yugoslavia showed that civilians die under such attacks, while regular 
troops even retain their military hardware, virtually untouched. Small 
gangs and bases in Afghanistan would be even more difficult targets...
     On the other hand, in declaring war on international terrorism, 
the United States should be prepared to effectively defend its own 
territory. Specially-trained armed forces are needed to do so. In the 
United States, this is the job of the National Guard. It is uncertain 
as yet whether the National Guard will be adequate against large armed 
formations, or whether it can be relied on to maintain security for 
the nation and strategic sites. Particularly problematic is the 
security of American companies and embassies in other regions of the 
world, and the security of Washington's NATO allies in Europe.
     War against terrorism on the global scale is primarily about 
politics. This is what Washington needs to think about seriously - the 
Washington which nurtured plans for global dominance and made advances 
to terrorists. It is important for the United States to understand 
that simply increasing military might and attempting to bully the rest 
of the world into submission (including the countries it disdainfully 
calls rogue states) is no solution. Experience shows that terrorism 
knows no borders, it doesn't fear brute force, and it expands rapidly 
under favorable circumstances. And conditions will be favorable - in 
the form of anti-American sentiments - if there are strikes against 
Afghanistan and some other Arab nations.
     But there is a simple and easy way forward for Washington. The 
United States should return to the international community as a fully-
fledged member, and join other countries in looking for ways of 
countering international terrorism. However, this would mean 
abandoning some US goals. First and foremost, it would have to abandon 
its strategy of a mono-polar world under US dominance.
     The latest reports from Washington indicate that different 
conclusions are being drawn there. Relying on its NATO allies, the 
United States hopes to be able to defeat terrorism all on its own. 
Likewise, it hopes to create a world to suit itself. Washington still 
hopes to be able to tame terrorists and use them in future against its 
real or imagined enemies.
     Moreover, the United States would not mind gaining some political 
dividends from the tragedy. Contrary to all logic, Washington is 
presenting the hijacked airliners as another pretext for a missile 
shield, one which would end strategic parity.
     Washington has also found another pretext for the existence (and 
enlargement?) of NATO. For the first time ever, the Americans intend 
to invoke Article 5 of the NATO founding charter: which stipulates 
joint defense if any NATO member is attacked. It doesn't matter to 
Washington that this document was written under entirely different 
circumstances, and meant to apply to entirely different situations. 
Even the Americans themselves don't know whom NATO members are going 
to fight.
     And yet, Washington is clutching at the tragedy as a precedent, 
probably in order to be able to direct subsequent developments 
according to the same old script. Instead of humanitarian disasters, 
as in Kosovo, terrorist attacks may now be used as an excuse for armed 
aggression.
     Apparently, the United States is still preparing itself for wars 
for global dominance. It is not yet prepared to challenge 
international terrorism, not even morally prepared. We can only hope 
that President Bush's European colleagues will share some of their 
experience with him - if Washington is prepared to listen, that is. 
Unfortunately, not everyone is prepared to learn from the mistakes of 
others.

-------------------------------------------------
This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been 
shut down

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to