HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

South China Morning Post 

Wednesday, November 28, 2001
McDonald's must eat words in McChina name battle 

REUTERS in London 
Updated at 11.38am:
McDonald's, the world's largest restaurant company, on Tuesday lost a legal bid to 
stop a British-based restaurateur from using the name ''McChina''. 

A judge at London's High Court said the US fast food giant, which has 29,000 outlets 
worldwide, was trying to monopolise the ''Mc'' prefix. 

Judge David Neuberger overruled an earlier decision to prevent restaurateur Frank Yu 
Kwan Yuen from registering ''McChina'' as a British trademark. 

''It appears to me on analysis that McDonald's are virtually seeking to monopolise all 
names and words with the prefix Mc or Mac,'' the judge said. 

Mr Yuen said he hoped to create ''a new generation of Chinese food'' with fast food 
restaurants across Britain. 

Mr Yuen, who moved to England from China in 1967, said he had adopted the Mc prefix to 
signify ''son of'', as in Scottish names. 

However, his trademark application was rejected after McDonald's said it breached its 
established trademarks including McDonald's, MacDonald's, Mc and Mac. 

The Illinois-based company said it feared the McChina name would confuse customers 
into thinking the Chinese fast food restaurants were owned by McDonald's. 

Rejecting McDonald's evidence, the judge said there was an ''absence of any evidence 
of confusion''. 

After the hearing, Mr Yuen was quoted by the Times newspaper as saying he was ''as 
happy as a drunken prawn''. 

Mr Yuen opened the first McChina restaurant in Wimbledon, southwest London in 1991, 
under the names McChina Stir Fried and McChina Wok Away. 

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to