HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the Dec. 6, 2001
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

BEWARE THE SIREN SONG: 
WOMEN'S LIBERATION & AFGHANISTAN

By Minnie Bruce Pratt

As U.S. bombing and troop presence has intensified in 
Afghanistan, the mainstream media have issued a barrage of 
articles, photographs, opinion pieces and interviews 
claiming this war will liberate Afghan women. They present 
it as a "collateral benefit," that the war will reverse the 
Taliban's cruel oppression of women and even give women a 
chance to get political rights under a new government.

Government officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, 
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Secretary of 
State Colin Powell have addressed the same subject in news 
conferences, briefings and interviews.

Most dramatically, "First Lady" Laura Bush was in front of 
the microphone on Nov. 17, instead of her husband, for the 
president's usual Saturday radio address, so she could 
testify about the oppression of Afghan women under the 
Taliban.

This media blitz has been orchestrated through the 
governmental Coalition Information Center, set up to counter 
any criticism of the U.S. war. The campaign is coordinated 
by spin-doctors like public relations industry legend 
Charlotte Beers, former chair of giant ad agency J. Walter 
Thompson. Four of the key "gatekeepers" of this campaign are 
women, including chief Pentagon spokesperson Victoria Clarke 
and Mary Matlin, chief political adviser to Vice President 
Cheney.

Matlin said of these women's commitment to advocating for 
the war: "I think we probably bring--and I don't mean this 
to sound sexist--but we probably have more of a subconscious 
outrage at these issues...This is something that crosses my 
mind every day: a third of these women in pre-Taliban days 
were doctors, lawyers and teachers. You can't help but be 
outraged." (New York Times, Nov. 11)

THE REAL OUTRAGE

What pre-Taliban days is she talking about? The outrage is 
ours if we look at the real history of women's liberation in 
Afghanistan. Yes, terrible things have been done to women 
under the Taliban rule. But how did the Taliban come into 
existence? And what was the role of the United States?

In 1978 a revolution created a secular government in 
Afghanistan that tried to liberate the workers and peasants 
from the grip of feudal landlords. The secular government 
was based on a young socialist movement, the Progressive 
Democratic Party of Afghanistan. The revolutionaries 
cancelled mortgage debts of laborers and tenants; these 
debts had been inherited over generations so that feudal 
warlords held land workers as virtual serfs. And they 
promoted the welfare and liberation of women.

This revolutionary government immediately moved to improve 
the terrible conditions women had endured. It set up 
literacy programs especially for women, whose illiteracy 
rate was 96 percent. It trained more teachers and published 
textbooks in local languages. It organized brigades of women 
to go into the countryside to provide medical services and 
by 1985 increased hospital beds by 80 percent.

Decrees were issued abolishing the bride price so women 
could be free to choose their marriages and prohibiting the 
punishment of women for losing their virginity before 
marriage. Women were able to train and then work as doctors, 
teachers and lawyers.

Did the U.S. government know of these things? These facts 
about the Afghan revolution can be found in a book published 
by the U.S. Department of the Army entitled, "Afghanistan--a 
Country Study for 1986."

Yet it was this enlightened government that U.S. President 
Jimmy Carter set out to overthrow by organizing a massive 
counter-revolutionary army of religious fundamentalists in 
1979. This CIA-orchestrated and funded war forced the Afghan 
government to call for Soviet military assistance. What 
followed was a bitter conflict that lasted more than a 
decade and eventually overthrew the progressive regime. More 
years of war followed as the Taliban, the Northern Alliance 
and other factions, all of which drew their power from the 
feudal landlord class, fought for supremacy. (Workers World, 
Oct. 10, 1996)

The CIA facilitated the formation of Osama bin Laden's 
organization back in the 1980s to attack the progressive 
government in Afghanistan. As vice president, George Bush 
Sr. oversaw the operation. Subsequently, bin Laden's troops 
murdered teachers, doctors and nurses, disfigured women who 
took off the veil, and shot down civilian airliners with 
U.S.-supplied Stinger missiles. (Workers World, Oct. 4)

WHAT THE U.S. DOES CARE ABOUT

Now Bush and the generals claim to care about the rights of 
women living in the counter-revolution they financed and 
engineered. But the U.S. has consistently disregarded the 
plight and status of women in Afghanistan. The White House 
and Pentagon knew the reactionary position of the U.S.-
financed and trained fundamentalist groups towards women. 
But this was immaterial to the goal of the U.S. government 
to support the interests of oil corporations that have been 
trying to get a pipeline through Afghanistan for about 10 
years.

In a May 26, 1997, New York Times article, John F. Burns 
wrote: "While deploring the Taliban's policies on women and 
the adoption of a penal code that provides for the 
amputation of thieves' hands and the stoning to death of 
adulterers, the United States has sometimes acted as though 
a Taliban government might serve its interests.

"The Clinton administration has taken the view that a 
Taliban victory would end a war that has killed 1.5 million 
Afghans; would act as a counterweight to Iran, whose Shiite 
Muslim leadership is fiercely opposed to the Sunni Muslims 
of the Taliban, and would offer the possibility of new trade 
routes that could weaken Russian and Iranian influence in 
the region.

"For example, a proposal by the Unocal Corporation of 
California for a $2.5 billion pipeline that would link the 
gas fields of Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan 
has attracted strong support in Washington, though human 
rights groups are likely to object to the plan. ... The 
Afghan project, strongly endorsed by the Taliban, is part of 
a broader concept under which the vast mineral resources of 
the former Soviet republics would be moved to markets along 
routes that would offer these countries a new autonomy from 
Moscow."

In May 1998, Time magazine reported that the CIA had "set up 
a secret task force to monitor the region's politics and 
gauge its wealth. Covert CIA officers, some well-trained 
petroleum engineers, had traveled through southern Russia 
and the Caspian region to sniff out potential oil reserves. 
When the policymakers heard the agency's report, [Secretary 
of State Madeleine] Albright concluded that 'working to mold 
the area's future was one of the most exciting things we can 
do.'"

'FREE TO BEG'

As U.S. Marines dig in and direct air attacks near Kandahar, 
the U.S. continues to try to mold the future of Afghan 
istan, Central Asia and the Middle East--but not out of 
concern for the future of women. On the first day of this 
war, U.S. bombs struck a Kabul hospital and killed 13 women 
in a gynecological hospital.

Now, after weeks of bombing, U.S. newspapers enthuse that 
Afghan women "are uncovering their faces, looking for jobs, 
walking happily with female friends on the street."

Yet, at the same time, Bush administration officials admit 
that they will not publicly insist women be included in 
talks about a post-Taliban coalition government. In fact, in 
the Bonn meeting scheduled by the U.S. and allies to arrange 
Afghanistan's future, only three token women have been 
included: the widow of a mujahedeen commander killed 
fighting against the former secular socialist government, 
and two backers of the long-deposed king. (New York Times, 
Nov. 26)

As the women of Afghanistan emerge into the horrifying 
destruction and chaos unleashed by U.S. bombing, what kind 
of freedom and what kind of rights will be theirs? A Nov. 19 
New York Times article entitled "Behind the Burka" concluded 
by focusing on a 56-year-old woman with no schooling, eight 
children and a dead husband.

The last line of the article sums up her "liberated" future 
under imperialist subjugation: "Now, at last, she is free to 
beg."

STOP THE WAR!

And that is a future this Afghan woman shares with many 
women in the United States--women on welfare who soon will 
be "free to beg" under the so-called Welfare Reform Act.

Passed during the Clinton administration, it basically 
eliminated Aid to Families with Dependent Children and set 
up a strict limit on the time length of benefits. The cut-
off date of Dec. 1 is now fast approaching for thousands of 
already impoverished women. Some will be evicted in the 
middle of freezing winter. Others will be forced to place 
their children in foster care. Still others will be denied 
the most basic health care and reproductive services for 
themselves and their children.

And the astronomical economic cost of the U.S. war on 
Afghanistan will take an even greater toll on the poor in 
this country--especially women and children.

The war against Afghanistan has never been about the 
liberation of women, not even as a "collateral benefit." It 
is about imperialist domination for capitalist profit. 
Opposition to this war, and this economic system, is the 
only thing that will help bring about the full liberation of 
women.

[Minnie Bruce Pratt, an anti-racist activist and lesbian 
author, is a long-time leader in the struggle for women's liberation.]

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to 
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but 
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact 
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to