HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

http://www.ummahnews.com/viewarticle.php?sid=2406

Is Bin Laden the Lord of the Rings?
2002-01-02 17:43:14

Professor Ira Chernus
2 January 2002

As I was mining deep in the recesses of www.whitehouse.gov , I unearthed
this gem:

Reporter: Does [bin Laden] have political goals? The President: He has
got evil goals. And it's hard to think in conventional terms about a man
so dominated by evil.

Is Osama bin Laden really the Lord of the Rings?

That question ran through my head for three hours, as I watched a
fellowship of brave warriors battle the forces of evil. Was I watching
The Lord of the Rings, or network coverage of the war on terrorism?

The villains have no political goals, for only human beings can have
political goals. These inhuman forces do evil simply for its own sake.
They are the cosmic principle of evil: dark, dark, dark. You dare not
think of them in conventional terms, lest you be accused of taking their
side.

All that stands between us and this implacable darkness is a small band
of ordinary guys doing extraordinary deeds in their unconventional
hit-and-run style. Always vastly outnumbered, they never lose a battle
and hardly ever a single life.

Are they really that good? Or is it just because they embody the cosmic
principle of goodness? Their devotion to honor, decency, and each other
is exemplary. And they invite us to come back to the theatre next
Christmas to see them defend the oh-so-white city, where we all hope to
live peacefully ever after.

If you have seen the movie and followed the war news, you can no doubt
extend the list of parallels.

This is dead serious. How many dead, in Afghanistan alone, the Pentagon
will make sure we never know.

The president's job is to hide the fact that bin Laden does have
political goals. He wants U.S. troops out of Saudi Arabia, an end to
bombing and sanctions in Iraq, and no more U.S. support for Israeli
occupation of Palestinian territory. More broadly, he wants to curb U.S.
influence in the Muslim world.

How many American lives are worth losing, to maintain our powerful
influence in the Middle East and throughout the Muslim world? If that
became a matter of public debate, the Bush administration and its war
might be in real trouble.

So the administration dehumanizes the enemy, casting bin Laden as the
dark prince of evil. Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union "the empire
of evil." But at least he admitted that the Soviets had a political
vision for which they waged cold war.

Bush dares not even go that far. He can only call us to a war against
Sauron and the evil forces of Mordor, a war with no end in sight. If we
believe in his mythic vision, we can not even begin to think about the
political issues involved.

The shocking fact is that most Americans do seem to believe in it. Have
we watched too many movies pitting pure shining good against the
mindless metaphysical principle of evil? Is there a seamless
infotainment web stretching from Lord of the Rings to the nightly news?

Or does the immense success of Lord of the Rings and all its imitators
point deeper, to the thousands of years that humans have told stories
about absolute good fighting absolute evil? The vast Christian lore of
God against Devil is only one corner of this much vaster, world-wide
legacy of myth and legend -- the same legacy that bin Laden himself
draws on so successfully.

So far, at least, the lure of simplistic myth has worked for the Bush
administration like a charm. A mere hint that El-Qaeda might have
political motives sets off panic alarms among the patriotic citizenry.

To raise any political question is to think about the enemy in
conventional terms; i.e., to treat them as human beings, not inhuman
orcs doing Sauron's bidding. That thought would open up too many
disturbing doors in the public mind. Easier to call it treason, set the
mind at rest, and go to the movies.

This is the peace movement's greatest challenge. As long as the enemy is
cast as an inhuman force of cosmic evil, we can not raise public
consciousness about alternatives to war. The pro-war forces know that
and count on it to keep the war going. We must insist, over and over, in
every way we can, as loudly as we can, that the contest is political,
not mythic or metaphysical. The victims of this war are dying in the
real world, not the Hollywood dream factory.

We can and should condemn the use of violence to gain political ends. We
can and should debate the validity of Islamist political principles and
goals. Many of us will wholeheartedly oppose them. But first we must
help to stop the killing. To do that, we must insist that even the
people whose principles and goals we most oppose are human beings, not
monsters from Mordor.

Ira Chernus is Professor of Religious Studies at the University of
Colorado at Boulder

Copyright C ummahnews.com 2001

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to