HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

STRATFOR: 

> Summit May Signal U.K.-U.S. Split Over Israel
>
> Summary
>
> Official statements following the recent meeting between U.S.
> President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair
> focused primarily on the need for military action in Iraq, but a
> joint statement on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was
> conspicuously absent. This could betray a deeper disagreement
> between the two countries over how to deal with Israel, further
> sidetracking Washington from its pursuit of al Qaeda.
>
> Analysis
>
> The recent meeting between U.S. President George W. Bush and
> British Prime Minister Tony Blair in Crawford, Texas, initially
> was supposed to focus on ways to help resolve the Israeli-
> Palestinian conflict. Instead, post-meeting statements by both
> heads of state focused primarily on Iraq.
>
> The two leaders needed to end the summit in agreement -- given
> that Washington needs a foreign policy boost from its closest
> European ally and Britain always benefits from publicly
> reinforcing its relationship with the United States -- and they
> did. In order to do so, however, they fell back an old, reliable
> enemy: Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. The post-summit emphasis
> on Iraq and the failure to endorse a common approach to the
> Israeli-Palestinian conflict may mask a more fundamental
> disagreement over Israel.
>
> A rift with London over Israel would create problems for
> Washington on two levels. First, the Bush administration has been
> trying to avoid getting bogged down in Israel because this would
> detract from its primary foreign policy objective of rooting out
> al Qaeda. Second, lacking widespread international support for
> its agenda, Washington can hardly afford a disagreement over
> Israel with its primary international ally, especially since it
> relies on London's unconditional support to promote its foreign
> policy agenda within Europe.
>
> The long-planned summit initially was meant to focus on the war
> against terrorism and particularly on Iraq. However, the rapidly
> escalating Israeli-Palestinian conflict put those discussions on
> the back burner.
>
> A Blair spokesman made clear before the prime minister's
> departure for Texas that efforts to revive the Israeli-
> Palestinian peace dialogue would dominate the summit. "At
> Crawford we will try to work out a way to get the political
> process restarted," the spokesman said, Agence France-Presse
> reported April 5. Blair himself set the stage for a joint
> announcement on the Middle East, telling reporters aboard his
> plane that, "we will obviously be looking at ideas that can lead
> to a cease-fire," according to the Associated Press.
>
> But after two days of meetings, no such plan or announcement
> came. The emphasis -- at least publicly -- was on Iraq instead,
> with Blair making his strongest statement to date in support of a
> regime change.
>
> Government spin-meisters clearly wanted coverage to focus on what
> Bush and Blair agreed to regarding Iraq, rather than what was not
> agreed regarding Israel. That focus was evident in subsequent
> headlines: "Blair Warns of Regime Change in Iraq," The
> Independent trumpeted, while in the Financial Times an April 8
> headline read, "Bush and Blair say Saddam must be removed."
>
> Immediate action on Iraq is clearly not on the table, however. In
> a pre-summit interview with British ITV, Bush said there were "no
> immediate plans" for action against Iraq and that no action is
> being contemplated until late 2002 or early 2003, The Guardian
> reported. Although Washington has refused to link action in Iraq
> with a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Bush did
> say that any action might have to be further put off unless the
> Israelis and Palestinians begin negotiating. Blair too has
> emphasized the need to quiet the storm in Israel before any
> action can be taken in Iraq.
>
> The divide between the European and U.S. approaches to the
> Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been growing over the last two
> weeks, with European leaders criticizing perceived waffling by
> Washington or complaining that Sharon has been given too much
> leeway in the occupied territories. This was punctuated April 2,
> when European Commission President Romano Prodi called U.S.
> mediation efforts a failure and urged Washington to step aside,
> allowing an international coalition to take the lead. Though
> Blair has been more constrained, he too has called for a tougher
> line against Israel.
>
> Blair de-emphasized the Israeli conflict in his keynote speech
> April 7, avoiding the issue until more than halfway through his
> speech and mentioning it only after first discussing the need for
> a regime change in Iraq. And though he backed Bush's decision to
> send U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell to Israel, he also
> offered more nuanced comments on the need for more direct and
> sustained involvement by the United States.
>
> "Engagement in the world ... not isolationism from it, is the
> hardheaded pragmatism for the 21st Century," Blair said. The
> prime minister spoke of the success in Kosovo and the need for
> "sustained focus, effort and engagement" in Kashmir.
>
> These statements seem to carry an implicit warning that the
> United States must insert itself more forcefully to halt the
> Israeli advance into the territories -- a message that would be
> supported by the rest of Europe but not well received by
> Washington, especially coming from Blair.
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< SEND THIS TO A FRIEND! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Did you like this analysis? Then forward it to a friend!
>
> Got this from a friend? Get your own by becoming a member!
>
> http://www.stratfor.com/house/about/subscriptions/about.php
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
>

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to