HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

http://www.arabnews.com/Article.asp?ID=14650
Thursday, April 25, 2002 / 12 Safar 1423        

ADL found guilty of spying by California court
By Barbara Ferguson, Arab News Correspondent

WASHINGTON, 25 April � The San Francisco Superior Court has awarded
former Congressman Pete McCloskey, R-California, a $150,000 court
judgment against the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

McCloskey, the attorney in the case, represented one of three civil
lawsuits filed in San Francisco against the ADL in 1993. The lawsuit
came after raids were made by the San Francisco Police Department and
the FBI on offices of the ADL in both San Francisco and Los Angeles,
which found that the ADL was engaged in extensive domestic spying
operations on a vast number of individuals and institutions around the
country.

During the course of the inquiry in San Francisco, the SFPD and FBI
determined the ADL had computerized files on nearly 10,000 people
across the country, and that more than 75 percent of the information
had been illegally obtained from police, FBI files and state drivers�
license data banks.

Much of the stolen information had been provided by Tom Gerard of the
San Francisco Police Department, who sold, or gave, the information to
Ray Bullock, ADL�s top undercover operative.

The investigation also determined that the ADL conduit, Gerard, was
also working with the CIA.

Two other similar suits against ADL were settled some years ago, and
the ADL was found guilty in both cases, but the McCloskey suit
continued to drag through the courts until last month.

In the McCloskey case, the ADL agreed to pay (from its annual
multi-million budget) $50,000 to each of the three plaintiffs � Jeffrey
Blankfort, Steve Zeltzer and Anne Poirier � who continued to press
charges against the ADL, despite a continuing series of judicial
roadblocks that forced 14 of the original defendants to withdraw.
Another two died during the proceedings.

The ADL, which calls itself a civil rights group, continued to claim it
did nothing wrong in monitoring their activities. Although the ADL
presents itself as a group that defends the interests of Jews, two of
three ADL victims are Jewish.

Blankfort and Zeltzer were targeted by the ADL because they were
critical of Israel�s policies toward the Palestinians.

The third ADL victim in the McCloskey case, Poirier, was not involved
in any activities related to Israel or the Middle East. Poirier ran a
scholarship program for South African exiles who were fighting the
apartheid system in South Africa.

At the time, the ADL worked closely with the then anti-apartheid
government of South Africa, and ADL�s operative Bullock provided ADL
with illegally obtained data on Poirier and her associates to the South
African government.

But the conclusion of McCloskey�s case does not mean the end to the
ADL�s legal problems.

On March 31, 2001, US District Judge Edward Nottingham of Denver,
Colorado, upheld most of a $10.5 million defamation judgment that a
federal jury in Denver had levied against the ADL in April of 2000.

The jury hit the ADL with the massive judgment after finding it had
falsely labeled Evergreen, Colorado residents � William and Dorothy
Quigley � as �anti-Semites.� The ADL is appealing the judgment.


=====
Lake Merritt Neighbors Organized for Peace.  Weekly peace walks around Lake Merritt in 
Oakland.  Starts & ends at the colonnade between Grand & Lakeshore Avenues, 3 P.M., 
every Sunday.  Info:  (510)763-8712, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or http://www.webwm.com/LMNOP

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to