HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------


   I don't hypocrisy is the right word. Actually, I don't think there is
a word to describe this is the english language.




To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:                   "Knight, Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                FW: Cheney & Saddam!! [WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK]
Date sent:              Wed, 3 Jul 2002 07:58:15 +0100
Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
> ---------------------------
>
>
> Bloody hypocrites!!!!
>
> http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/06.22A.cheney.hussein.htm
>
> Cheney Calls for the Destruction of His Client, Hussein
>
> (*Editors Note | This page contains two stories. The first, yesterday's
> Reuters news wire report of Dick Cheney's call for the overthrow of Saddam
> Hussein. The second is an account his business dealings with the Iraqi
> government. Cheney originally denied that Halliburton under his tenure as
> CEO had in fact circumvented US law to do business with Hussein's Iraqi
> government. He was later forced to retract his denials when presented with
> evidence of Halliburton's dealings.)
>
>
> Cheney Sees 'Gathering Danger' in Iraq
> http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-iraq-usa-cheney.html
>
> By Reuters | New York Times
>
> Thursday, 20 June, 2002
>
> DETROIT (Reuters) - Iraqi President Saddam Hussein represents a "gathering
> danger'' to the United States, Vice President Dick Cheney said on Thursday,
> while warning that Washington will act preemptively against threats of
> terrorism.
>
> "We are greatly concerned about any possible linkup between terrorists and
> regimes that have or seek weapons of mass destruction,'' said Cheney. "In
> the case of Saddam Hussein, we've got a dictator who is clearly pursuing and
> already possesses some of these weapons,'' he said.
>
> "A regime that hates America and everything we stand for must never be
> permitted to threaten America with weapons of mass destruction,'' the vice
> president added, referring to Saddam and the Iraqi forces he fought as
> defense minister under President Bush's father during the Gulf War in 1991.
>
> Cheney, who spoke at a political fund-raiser here, stopped short of saying
> there were any established ties between Baghdad and the al Qaeda network, or
> the Sept. 11 attacks that took about 3,000 U.S. lives.
>
> But he said the possibility of such links was too great to ignore,
> especially in light of Saddam's defiance of U.N. weapons inspection programs
> and international oversight.
>
> "This gathering danger requires the most urgent, deliberate and decisive
> response,'' he said.
>
> "It is very clear that our enemies are determined to do further significant
> damage to the American people,'' Cheney said, citing recent intelligence
> reports.
>
> "Wars are not won on the defensive,'' he added. "We must take the battle to
> the enemy anywhere necessary, to preempt greater stress to our country,'' he
> said.
>
> =======================================
>
> Cheney Made Millions Off Oil Deals with Hussein
> by Martin A. Lee
> San Francisco Bay Guardian
>
> November 13, 2000
>
> Here's a whopper of a story you may have missed amid the cacophony of
> campaign ads and stump speeches in the run- up to the elections.
>
> During former defense secretary Richard Cheney's five-year tenure as chief
> executive of Halliburton, Inc., his oil services firm raked in big bucks
> from dubious commercial dealings with Iraq. Cheney left Halliburton with a
> $34 million retirement package last July when he became the GOP's
> vice-presidential candidate.
>
> Of course, U.S. firms aren't generally supposed to do business with Saddam
> Hussein. But thanks to legal loopholes large enough to steer an oil tanker
> through, Halliburton profited big-time from deals with the Iraqi
> dictatorship. Conducted discreetly through several Halliburton subsidiaries
> in Europe, these greasy transactions helped Saddam Hussein retain his grip
> on power while lining the pockets of Cheney and company.
>
> According to the Financial Times of London, between September 1998 and last
> winter, Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, oversaw $23.8 million of business
> contracts for the sale of oil-industry equipment and services to Iraq
> through two of its subsidiaries, Dresser Rand and Ingersoll-Dresser Pump,
> which helped rebuild Iraq's war-damaged petroleum-production infrastructure.
> The combined value of these contracts exceeded those of any other U.S.
> company doing business with Baghdad.
>
> Halliburton was among more than a dozen American firms that supplied Iraq's
> petroleum industry with spare parts and retooled its oil rigs when U.N.
> sanctions were eased in 1998. Cheney's company utilized subsidiaries in
> France, Italy, Germany, and Austria so as not to draw undue attention to
> controversial business arrangements that might embarrass Washington and
> jeopardize lucrative ties to Iraq, which will pump $24 billion of petrol
> under the U.N.-administered oil-for-food program this year. Assisted by
> Halliburton, Hussein's government will earn another $1 billion by illegally
> exporting oil through black-market channels.
>
> With Cheney at the helm since 1995, Halliburton quickly grew into America's
> number-one oil-services company, the fifth-largest military contractor, and
> the biggest nonunion employer in the nation. Although Cheney claimed that
> the U.S. government "had absolutely nothing to do" with his firm's meteoric
> financial success, State Department documents obtained by the Los Angeles
> Times indicate that U.S. officials helped Halliburton secure major contracts
> in Asia and Africa. Halliburton now does business in 130 countries and
> employs more than 100,000 workers worldwide.
>
> Its 1999 income was a cool $15 billion.
>
> In addition to Iraq, Halliburton counts among its business partners several
> brutal dictatorships that have committed egregious human rights abuses,
> including the hated military regime in Burma (Myanmar).
>
> EarthRights, a Washington, D.C.-based human rights watchdog, condemned
> Halliburton for two energy-pipeline projects in Burma that led to the forced
> relocation of villages, rape, murder, indentured labor, and other crimes
> against humanity.
>
> A full report (this is a 45 page pdf file - there is also a brief summary)
> on the Burma connection, "Halliburton's Destructive Engagement," can be
> accessed on EarthRights' Web site
>
> Human rights activists have also criticized Cheney's company for its
> questionable role in Algeria, Angola, Bosnia, Croatia, Haiti, Rwanda,
> Somalia, Indonesia, and other volatile trouble spots. In Russia,
> Halliburton's partner, Tyumen Oil, has been accused of committing massive
> fraud to gain control of a Siberian oil field.
>
> And in oil-rich Nigeria, Halliburton worked with Shell and Chevron, which
> were implicated in gross human rights violations and environmental
> calamities in that country. Indeed, Cheney's firm increased its involvement
> in the Niger Delta after the military government executed several ecology
> activists and crushed popular protests against the oil industry.
>
> Halliburton also had business dealings in Iran and Libya, which remain on
> the State Department's list of terrorist states. Brown and Root, a
> Halliburton subsidiary, was fined $3.8 million for reexporting U.S. goods to
> Libya in violation of U.S. sanctions.
>
> But in terms of sheer hypocrisy, Halliburton's relationship with Saddam
> Hussein is hard to top. What's more, Cheney lied about his company's
> activities in Iraq when journalists fleetingly raised the issue during the
> campaign.
>
> Questioned by Sam Donaldson on ABC's This Week program in August, Cheney
> bluntly asserted that Halliburton had no dealings with the Iraqi regime
> while he was on board.
>
> Donaldson: I'm told, and correct me if I'm wrong, that Halliburton, through
> subsidiaries, was actually trying to do business in Iraq?
>
> Cheney: No. No. I had a firm policy that I wouldn't do anything in Iraq even
> arrangements that were supposedly legal.
>
> And that was it! ABC News and the other U.S. networks dropped the issue like
> a hot potato. As damning information about Halliburton surfaced in the
> European press, American reporters stuck to old routines and took their cues
> on how to cover the campaign from the two main political parties, both of
> which had very little to say about official U.S. support for abusive
> corporate policies at home and abroad.
>
> But why, in this instance, didn't the Democrats stomp and scream about
> Cheney's Iraq connection? The Gore campaign undoubtedly knew of
> Halliburton's smarmy business dealings from the get-go.
>
> Gore and Lieberman could have made hay about how the wannabe GOP veep had
> been in cahoots with Saddam. Such explosive revelations may well have swayed
> voters and boosted Gore's chances in what was shaping up to be a close
> electoral contest.
>
> The Democratic standard-bearers dropped the ball in part because
> Halliburton's conduct was generally in accordance with the foreign policy of
> the Clinton administration. Cheney is certainly not the only Washington
> mover and shaker to have been affiliated with a company trading in Iraq.
> Former CIA Director John Deutsch, who served in a Democratic administration,
> is a member of the board of directors of Schlumberger, the second-largest
> U.S. oil-services company, which also does business through subsidiaries in
> Iraq.
>
> Despite occasional rhetorical skirmishes, a bipartisan foreign-policy
> consensus prevails on Capital Hill, where the commitment to human rights,
> with a few notable exceptions, is about as deep as an oil slick.
>
> Truth be told, trading with the enemy is a time-honored American corporate
> practice or perhaps "malpractice" would be a more appropriate description of
> big-business ties to repressive regimes.
>
> Given that Saddam Hussein, the pariah du jour, has often been compared to
> Hitler, it's worth pointing out that several blue-chip U.S. firms profited
> from extensive commercial dealings with Nazi Germany.
>
> Shockingly, some American companies =96 including Standard Oil, Ford, ITT,
> GM, and General Electric secretly kept trading with the Nazi enemy while
> American soldiers fought and died during World War II.
>
> Today General Electric is among the companies that are back in business with
> Saddam Hussein, even as American jets and battleships attack Iraq on a
> weekly basis using weapons made by G.E. But the United Nations sanctions
> committee, dominated by U.S. officials, has routinely blocked medicines and
> other essential items from being delivered to Iraq through the oil-for-food
> program, claiming they have a potential military "dual use." These sanctions
> have taken a terrible toll on ordinary Iraqis, and on children in
> particular, while the likes of Halliburton and G.E. continue to lubricate
> their coffers.
>
>   � : t r u t h o u t 2002
>
> ---------------------------
> ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST
>
>

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to