HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

http://www.hinduonnet.com/stories/2002091803971100.htm

The Hindu
September 18, 2002

Rethink on reliance on U.S.? 
By Amit Baruah 


-India also seems to be keeping its options open as
far as long-term foreign policy is concerned. By
consenting to and participating in the first-ever
trilateral meeting between Indian, Russian and Chinese
Foreign Ministers, New Delhi has sent a subtle message
that all policy strings are not tied to the U.S. 
-



ZURICH SEPT. 17. As the Prime Minister, Atal Behari
Vajpayee, and his entourage savoured the sights of
Zurich, the Swiss city, there was a moment to stop and
ponder on his just-completed visit to the United
Nations General Assembly in New York. 

Mr. Vajpayee, whose meeting with the United States
President, George W. Bush, was his most important
bilateral interaction during his six-day visit, seemed
pleased with the meeting but did speak about the
delays in implementing decisions on bilateral
cooperation between the two countries. 

It is also clear that India has not relented on Iraq;
the Prime Minister was quite clear that New Delhi was
not about to issue a carte blanche to the U.S. on
Iraq. The unflinching support extended to the U.S.
plans for a national missile defence system was
significantly missing this time round. 

While India rightly holds that Indo-U.S. relations
should not be held hostage to ties with Pakistan,
there is little doubt that the growing "strategic
cooperation'' between the U.S. and Pakistan has
impacted the ascending curve of Washington's
relationship with New Delhi. 

The U.S. may make the right noises about delivering a
"hard message" to Pakistan on the issue of
cross-border terrorism but American and Pakistani
cooperation against the Al-Qaeda seems to be growing
by the day. The latest arrests in Karachi only go to
confirm this trend. 

Such a trend cannot please India which believes that
Islamabad is a source of terrorism and the
international community cannot wink at what it does in
Jammu and Kashmir while cooperating against the
Al-Qaeda in Pakistan. 

India also seems to be keeping its options open as far
as long-term foreign policy is concerned. By
consenting to and participating in the first-ever
trilateral meeting between Indian, Russian and Chinese
Foreign Ministers, New Delhi has sent a subtle message
that all policy strings are not tied to the U.S. 

Here, it needs to be emphasised that there is no
effort to antagonise anyone, but show that there are
other kinds of cooperation that New Delhi would like
to explore. There has been little comment from Indian
officials on the meeting; a low-key approach is
obvious. 

At the General Assembly itself, the Pakistan
President, Pervez Musharraf, queered the pitch for Mr.
Vajpayee when he launched a full-scale attack on the
BJP for the carnage in Gujarat on September 12. The
next day Mr. Vajpayee responded in kind. Most of his
speech to the Assembly was devoted to countering the
points made by Gen. Musharraf and scoring some of his
own. 

At his press conference in New York on Saturday
evening, the Prime Minister correctly said the General
did not need any "provocation'' to attack India. But,
the fact remains that the Prime Minister and his party
have provided "live ammunition'' to the General to use
against India on international fora. Gujarat is an
issue which the General can use against India in
future as well � he could just point to reports in the
Indian press about the carnage that went on in the
State. There is, it would appear, a growing need to
punish the guilty and show to the world that the
Government's words are backed up with action. 

As far as India-Pakistan bilateral relations are
concerned, the two countries remain poles apart on the
question of resuming the dialogue. Mr. Vajpayee said
at a public meeting last Friday that the General had
said many false things at the General Assembly � the
post-Agra sense of disappointment with the Pakistani
ruler continues to operate. 

Informed sources said Mr. Vajpayee had little faith in
the General and, hence, the possibility of forward
movement between the two countries appeared bleak.
Overall, it is clear that the Pakistan factor has
prompted a re-think on India's sole reliance on the
U.S. as far as dealing with the issue of cross-border
terrorism is concerned. 

India seems to have exhausted this track as far as
dealing with cross-border terrorism. While it must
stick to putting diplomatic pressure on Islamabad, New
Delhi must be seeing the renewed confidence with which
Gen. Musharraf walks on the international stage. 

With the bilateral path with Pakistan blocked by
contrasting positions, and the international community
unable to break the logjam, the stalemate in South
Asia can only continue. 




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to