HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------
*Military role for Iraq opposition planned*
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/2/hi/world/middle_east/2281949.stm>

Washington appears to be preparing to train Iraqi opposition groups to
act in support roles in the event of an invasion of Iraq.

------------------------------------------------------------
  Wednesday, 25 September, 2002, 21:17 GMT 22:17 UK
      Military role for Iraq opposition planned
 
      
      US forces on exercises in the Gulf
 
      The US appears to be preparing to expand its backing and training for
      Iraqi opposition groups.
      US officials are reported to have said that the US military is planning to
      bring Iraqi opposition members into support roles for troops during an
      attack on Iraq.
      President George Bush has made it absolutely clear that the US is going to
      seek "regime change" in Iraq - only the timing, circumstances and
      international backing for a military operation appear yet to be resolved.
      At the United Nations in New York, there is as yet no sign of any new
      resolution on Iraq being ready for presentation to the Security Council.
      Mr Bush has said that Saddam Hussein represents as much as a threat to the
      US as the al-Qaeda network.
      Closer co-operation
      Correspondents say that Washington does not see the various Iraqi
      opposition groups as a viable force that might oppose Saddam Hussein
      militarily - in the style of the Northern Alliance opposition forces in
      Afghanistan.
 

            There is clearly much more that can be done under the Iraq
            Liberation Act... The Defense Department is presently determining to
            what extent our level of effort under the act should be increased
 
            Lynn Cassel
            State Department spokeswoman
      Closer co-operation and co-ordination with the Iraqi opposition appears to
      be what the US is proposing.
      A State Department spokeswoman said Washington plans to expand the
      training it provides to the Iraqi opposition but had not decided how far
      it should go.
      The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 gave the US Government authority to
      provide the opposition with goods and services worth up to $97 million,
      including training.
      Only $1 million of this has so far been used, and more than 100 members of
      the opposition have received training.
            
            Defiant: Saddam Hussein on Iraqi TV on Tuesday
 
      "There is clearly much more that can be done under the Iraq Liberation
      Act... The Defense Department is presently determining to what extent our
      level of effort under the act should be increased," said the state
      department's Lynn Cassel.
      Another US official, quoted by the Reuters news agency, said: "The way to
      think about it is not as a 10,000-strong army but how opposition can be
      brought in support roles, which would be as interpreters, guides, liaison
      with local population and local advisers."
      "This is a significant step but we're not providing arms to a surrogate
      military force," another official told Reuters.
      'Combat training'
      The Los Angeles Times has reported that the White House is expected to
      seek congressional approval for the move soon.
            
            The US is looking for a tough new resolution on Iraq
 
      An Iraqi opposition source in London is reported by Reuters to have said
      the US has asked the Iraqi opposition to prepare lists of candidates for
      possible military training in tasks that would help US forces attacking
      Iraq.
      The source said that the US is seeking between 5,000 and 10,000 people,
      but suggested that Washington was proposing to train Iraqi opposition
      members in combat roles.
      The US administration under President Bill Clinton was very wary of
      backing the Iraqi opposition which it regarded as ineffective and without
      support inside Iraq.
      The current administration has sought to rehabilitate the Iraqi
      opposition.
      Resolution delay
      At the United Nations in New York, diplomats are still waiting to see a
      proposed draft resolution on Iraq.
      The BBC's Liz Blunt says that not every member of the Security Council
      thinks a new resolution is needed, but they know the Washington is
      determined to have one, and they are prepared at least to discuss it.
      Diplomats say that arguments are still taking place in Washington about
      what kind of resolution they want to put forward and how strong they want
      it to be.
      There have been suggestions that the resolution might not be a purely
      American affair but might be co-sponsored by the UK, America's closest
      ally on the Council.
      In London, UK Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has said Russia, China and
      France are closer to accepting the need for a fresh United Nations
      resolution about Iraq.
      Russia has said it is prepared to consider a new resolution.
      But Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov has dismissed a dossier on the dangers of
      the Iraqi regime published by the British Government on Tuesday.
      He said it was not worth creating a "great propaganda furore" over the
      document.
      'Saddam's madness'
      President Bush told reporters on Wednesday that Saddam Hussein and Osama
      Bin Laden's al-Qaeda network were working "in concert".
      "The danger is that al-Qaeda becomes an extension of Saddam's madness and
      his hatred and his capacity to extend weapons of mass destruction around
      the world. Both of them need to be dealt with," he warned.
---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to