HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38215-2002Oct3.html

Allies Hit Iraq's No-Fly Zone Again 
By Pauline Jelinek
Associated Press Writer
Thursday, October 3, 2002; 1:28 PM 


-The retaliatory [sic] action brought to 46 the number
of "strike days" reported this year by the United
States and the United Kingdom.... 
-It was the third time in nine days that planes
launched strikes in the area, trying to destroy
communications equipment, control radar and a
surface-to-air missile launcher, in missions Sept. 25
and 28.
Repeat missions have become common in recent weeks.
Coalition aircraft for the sixth time in a month
struck this week near Al Kut, 100 miles southeast of
Baghdad, because Iraqis keep moving mobile radar
equipment to the area, Pentagon officials said.
-Coalition strikes are not necessarily aimed at the
place or equipment used to target them. Defense
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld disclosed recently that
he has ordered that pilots attack command and
communications links in Iraq's air defense network
rather than the guns and radars used to target or
shoot at U.S. and British pilots.



WASHINGTON �� Allied forces dropped thousands of
leaflets over southern Iraq Thursday, warning Saddam
Hussein's troops against firing on British and U.S.
planes that have been patrolling the no-fly zone.
Iraqi forces fired on aircraft delivering the leaflets
and allied forces bombed an air defense operations
center in response, said officials at the U.S. Central
Command.
It was the first known direct warning from the
Pentagon to Iraq's military rank and file since the
Bush administration launched its campaign to topple
Saddam. Defense officials said on condition of
anonymity that it is not directly related to another
leaflet campaign in which the Pentagon plans to warn
Iraqi officers against firing chemical or biological
weapons in the event of U.S. military action to remove
Saddam.
The retaliatory action brought to 46 the number of
"strike days" reported this year by the United States
and the United Kingdom coalition put together to
patrol zones set up to protect Iraqi minorities
following the 1991 Gulf War. On some days, more than
one area is bombed.
Officials said coalition aircraft dropped 120,000
leaflets depicting a fighter jet bombing a missile
launcher and a radar site with the message: "Iraqi ADA
(air defense artillery) Beware! Don't track or fire on
coalition aircraft!"
"The destruction experienced by your colleagues in
other air defense locations is a response to your
continuing aggression toward planes of the coalition
forces," leaflets written in Arabic said in reference
to the four dozen times coalition planes have struck
back this year.
"No tracking or firing on these aircraft will be
tolerated. You could be next," said an English
translation released by defense officials.
"We were telling them 'Don't shoot at us or we'll
shoot back'," said Navy Commander Frank Merriman, a
spokesman for Central Command in Tampa, Fla. "And they
were shooting at that aircraft that was dropping the
leaflets!"
He said a similar leaflet drop was done last October
to try to halt the firing on planes patrolling the
restricted zones over Iraq.
Another official insisted Thursday's action was not
related to any possible war with Iraq, portraying it
as something done from time to time to remind Iraqi
gunners they target coalition planes at their peril.
Three officials said they didn't know how often it had
been done before. They discussed the situation only on
grounds of anonymity.
"Today's strike came after Iraq air defenses fired
anti-aircraft artillery and surface-to-air missiles at
coalition aircraft," said a statement from the Central
Command.
In their retaliation, coalition planes targeted
precision-guided weapons at the site, an operations
center and air defense headquarters for the sector
near Tallil, some 160 miles southeast of Baghdad at
4:30 a.m. EDT Thursday. There was no assessment
immediately available on how much damage was done.
It was the third time in nine days that planes
launched strikes in the area, trying to destroy
communications equipment, control radar and a
surface-to-air missile launcher, in missions Sept. 25
and 28.
Repeat missions have become common in recent weeks.
Coalition aircraft for the sixth time in a month
struck this week near Al Kut, 100 miles southeast of
Baghdad, because Iraqis keep moving mobile radar
equipment to the area, Pentagon officials said.
Iraq considers the patrols a violation of its
sovereignty and frequently shoots at the planes. In
response, coalition pilots try to bomb Iraqi air
defense systems.
Coalition strikes are not necessarily aimed at the
place or equipment used to target them. Defense
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld disclosed recently that
he has ordered that pilots attack command and
communications links in Iraq's air defense network
rather than the guns and radars used to target or
shoot at U.S. and British pilots.
The goal of the new approach, more than a decade after
American and British pilots began enforcing no-fly
zones, is to reduce dangers to the pilots while
increasing the damage inflicted on an Iraqi air
defense system that has grown more sophisticated.
The amount of any damage from Thursday's strike was
unknown because assessment was still under way.
The strike was in the southern zone, set up to protect
Shiite Muslims. The northern zone was set up to
protect the Kurdish population. Both groups were given
protection after unsuccessfully revolting against
Saddam's regime. 

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to