HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&msg_id=2782592&startrow=11&date=2002-10-11&do_alert=0

COMMENTARY   
THE U.S. AGAINST IRAQ: THE GUN IS COCKED  


MOSCOW, October 11, 2002. /RIA Novosti political
commentator Vladimir Simonov/. - The United States
made a decisive and risky step toward the second war
with Iraq. Both Houses of the US Congress passed the
resolution, which grants President George Bush the
authority to start unilateral military actions, if the
UN fails to disarm Iraq. 
The text of the document, approved in the House of
Representatives buy the 296-133 vote, gives the
President the right to deploy the U.S. Armed Forces
"as he deems necessary and appropriate". The purpose
of the possible strike, as it's formulated in the
resolution, is "to protect the national security of
the United States from the persistent threat posed by
Iraq and the implementation of all related resolutions
adopted by the UN Security Council. 
President Bush is, apparently, satisfied, but not very
much. The final draft of the resolution is much more
reserved than the one submitted by the White House,
which, in case it was approved, would have given the
administration a green light to conduct military
operations not only in Iraq, but anywhere in the
Middle East. 
The body of the document contains several
stipulations. The President has to exhaust all
diplomatic possibilities, including through the UN,
before he could give an order to start the war. Bush
also must inform the Congress before the attack or not
later than 48 hours after the decision to start the
war against Iraq has been made, that all peaceful
means to solve the conflict have been exhausted. In
case of the war, the resolution demands that the
President should inform the Congress about its course
every 60 days. 
It's interesting how the present atmosphere in the
Congress differs from the debates of 1991, when the
legislators decided whether to sanction the U.S.
operation in the Persian Gulf. The discussion lasted
till late after midnight and reminded of a family
quarrel. This time around, the House of
Representatives was half-empty on Thursday; the
arguments were all too familiar; and the debates were
lifeless - the result of voting was predetermined. 
This contrast shows the image of a new, frightened
country where after September 11 every American,
including Congressmen, feels vulnerable and
unprotected. The feelings that simply didn't exist 12
years ago. 
This is probably the reason why it's much easier for
Bush Jr to march into war than it was for Bush Sr.
Bush Junior managed to convince the Congress without
using three reasons that his father had to provide in
his time -- he doesn't have to prove the direct threat
coming from Iraq, he doesn't have to create an
international coalition before the start of the war,
and he doesn't have to get a UN approval to start
military actions against Iraq. 
The cunning tactics of the White House also played a
significant role. The closer it was coming to voting,
the less Bush and the members of his administration
pressed with arguments. They pushed the demand to
topple Saddam Hussein's regime behind, putting in
front the suggestion that the strong support of the
war coming from the Congress and the UN is the best
way to prevent the very war with Iraq. Because in that
case Saddam would finally realize that he doesn't have
a choice but to give up his weapons of mass
destruction. 
The argument worked, although it raised some serious
doubts among the Democrats who split their vote 126
"for"-81"against". 
The American administration is hoping that the same
argument could help eliminate the split in the UN
Security Council. The resolution almost pushes Russia,
China and France toward a reasonable compromise with
the USA. According to a U.S. high-ranking official,
"the international community realizes now that the
United States speaks with one voice". 
Washington, waiting nervously for the results of the
meeting between Tony Blair and Vladimir Putin in
Moscow, hopes that all five permanent members of the
Council will approve, without any abstentions, the new
UN Security Council resolution, which imposes a much
stricter regime of military inspection of Iraq. 
After all, Washington can have much more freedom to
act unilaterally from now on. The resolution adopted
by the Congress permits Bush to enter the war in order
to implement "all relevant UN resolutions", and not
particularly the one adopted only recently. 
After the voting, many Americans are feeling a certain
mixture of moral emptiness and sharp anxiety. They
keep asking themselves whether it might turn out to be
a new Vietnam? 
The letter to the Congress, written by the CIA
Director George Tenet, provided a new reason for such
uncertainty among the American public. It was
declassified right before the voting on the Iraqi
resolution and surprisingly stated that, according to
the American intelligence sources, Saddam Hussein
didn't have any plans of a terrorist attack against
the United States. At the same time, according to the
same sources, the risk that Saddam would use weapons
of mass destruction in case if the U.S strike against
Iraq has an almost 100 percent probability. 
Therefore, the resolution passed by the Congress, as
well as the overall Bush's rhetoric, in reality,
brings the mankind much closer to the very encounter
with horrible gases and germs which the U.S. President
allegedly attempts to prevent.  
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.therussiajournal.com

The Russia Journal
October 12, 2002


Healthy-looking Yeltsin condemns Bush on Iraq 
BERLIN (Reuters) - Former Russian President Boris
Yeltsin strongly condemned U.S. President George W.
Bush's policy towards Baghdad on Sunday and said he
saw no danger from Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. 
"I consider (Bush's) whole policy unacceptable,"
Yeltsin told Reuters as he left a Berlin hospital
after undergoing a heart check-up. "It is a simple
diktat of the United States without agreement from the
United Nations or the world community. That is just
impermissible." 
"Iraq is not spreading terrorism," said Yeltsin,
Russia's first democratically elected president who
helped bring about the fall of Soviet Communism. 
Yeltsin's successor, Vladimir Putin, supported Bush's
war on terror after the September 11 attacks on the
United States but has also made clear he opposes the
use of force to overthrow the Iraqi president. 
"As a bare minimum the agreement of the United Nations
Security Council is needed," Yeltsin said. "The issue
can be solved through contact and negotiation." 
"I do not see any danger from Saddam," he told
Reuters.... 
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&msg_id=2782509&startrow=11&date=2002-10-11&do_alert=0


RUSSIA CONCERNED ABOUT MISSILE STRIKES DELIVERED BY US
AND UK AGAINST IRAQ  


MOSCOW, October 11, 2002. /from a RIA Novosti
correspondent/. - Moscow anxiously reports the growing
number of air strikes against Iraq, delivered in the
so-called no-fly zones enforced by US and UK
unilaterally, the Russian Federation's Foreign
Ministry Information and Press Department informed RIA
Novosti on Friday. 
Following the tragic event in the town of Nasyria,
which caused deaths of five people, on October
9th-10th Anglo-American air forces continued
bombarding civilian facilities around the towns of
Mosul and Basra. 
"Russia is definitely sure that carrying on missile
attacks on Iraqi territory thwarts the world
community's efforts for keeping on the process of
Iraqi settlement in the politico-diplomatic sphere and
making favourable conditions for the resumption of UN
inspectors' work in Iraq," the Russian Foreign
Ministry pointed out.  
--------------------------------------------------------------
http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&msg_id=2782899&startrow=1&date=2002-10-11&do_alert=0


RUSSIAN SENATOR OPPOSES DECISION TO USE FORCE AGAINST
IRAQ  


MOSCOW, October 11th, 2002. /From a RIA Novosti
correspondent/. Mikhail Margelov, Head of the Russian
Federation Council Committee for Foreign Affairs
thinks that "it is necessary to rule out any
possibility of using force against Iraq." Mr. Margelov
told RIA Novosti that "it is important to keep the
unity among the UN Security Council." France and China
share this viewpoint, Mikhail Margelov stressed. 
It is obvious that British Prime Minister Tony Blair
gave Russian President Vladimir Putin no new evidence
proving that Iraq possesses mass destruction weapons,
the Russian Senator stressed. It is a well-known fact
that the report submitted by the British authorities
not long ago "left more questions unanswered." That is
why, Mr. Margelov thinks, "Russia should stick to its
policy to make Iraq transparent." "International
inspectors should have the same objective. Only in
this way we can really say how dangerous for
international stability Iraqi armament and weapon
production capacities are," the Russian Senator said. 
Mikhail Margelov emphasized that it was very important
that Great Britain had stated that Russia had
interests in the region. "We have to remind our
partners of it quite often," Mr. Margelov added. 
According to the Russian Senator, every UN Security
Council member-state understands that the long-run
objective is to rule out remilitarization of Iraq. "It
is important to combine our efforts to find the
optimal way to reach it," Mikhail Margelov emphasized.

Now everything favours ratification of a new
resolution on Iraq that would give the UN inspections
necessary status," Mr. Margelov said. "It is necessary
to induce Iraq to cooperate with the UN inspection
voluntary and without any conditions."  
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.gazeta.ru/2002/10/11/Russianoilty.shtml

Gazeta.ru
October 11, 2002 

Russian oil tycoon warns of Iraqi war consequences
Yevgeniy Kalyukov�
Yukos chairman Mikhail Khodorkovsky is convinced that
if the US is successful in forcing a regime change in
Iraq, the price for Russian Urals-grade oil may slump
to $12-14 per barrel, which is lower than the Finance
Ministry's most pessimistic forecasts envisioned in
next year's draft budget. 
Khodorkovsky the board chairman of Russia's second
largest oil firm Yukos, who took part in the session
of the State Duma's Fatherland All Russia faction on
Thursday, believes a US attack on Iraq may inflict
substantial damage to the oil industry of Russia, and,
subsequently, to Russia's oil-dependent budget. ''If
the campaign is quick and effective, the oil price may
drop for a while,'' Khodorkovsky told the deputies. 
According to the optimistic forecasts, if the US
succeeds in establishing control over Iraqi oilfields,
the price for Russian Urals may drop to $14-16 per
barrel. 
The more pessimistic scenario in the case of a swift
US victory is a price for Russian Urals on the world
market not exceeding $12-14 per barrel. According to
Khodorkovsky, the oil price will return to its
''acceptable level'' of $27 per barrel ''in the
medium-term perspective'', or three and a half years. 
Yukos' chief is convinced that the Russian government
has to take into consideration such an unfavourable
scenario when discussing Russia's position on the
possible military campaign of the United States and
their allies against Iraq. 
This is especially important given that the financial
plan drawn up by the Finance Ministry is calculated on
the basis of relatively high oil prices. The
Ministry's forecast of the country's economic
development up to 2005, too, is based on the same
figures. The average price for Urals in the past
months has amounted to $23.6. 
In the meantime, even the most pessimistic forecasts
coming from the Finance Ministry envisage only the
possibility of a return to a moderately low average
oil price. In that case Russian Urals will cost
$17-18.5 per barrel, which, according to the Finance
Minsitry, will turn a surplus budget into a deficit
one. 
As regards to the more favourable forecast, the
Finance Ministry considers it optimal if oil prices
remain between $21.5-22.5 per barrel until 2005. This
is especially important because with high oil prices
there is a chance for a higher price for Russia's
natural gas, which is also important for the national
budget, whereas a slump in oil prices leaves that
sector with little hope. 
The Duma deputies, who are very familiar with the
Finance Ministry's figures, listened to Khodorkovsky's
forecasts with great attention � in view of the second
reading of the draft budget, to be held in a week,
they may come in very useful.
---------------------------------------------------------------http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&msg_id=2782209&startrow=21&date=2002-10-11&do_alert=0

RUSSIAN EXPERT PREDICTS SHARP FLUCTUATIONS OF OIL
PRICES SHOULD U.S. START MILITARY ACTION AGAINST IRAQ 



MOSCOW, OCTOBER 11, 2002. /From a RIA Novosti
correspondent/. -- Colonel-General Leonid Ivashov,
vice-president of the Academy of Geopolitical
Problems, predicts sharp fluctuations of oil prices
should the USA start military action against Iraq. He
expressed such an opinion Friday speaking at the press
conference in RIA Novosti. 
Ivashov noted that Russia would only benefit if the
U.S. aggression against Iraq does not take place. In
any other case the development of the events will be
rather dramatic and unfortunate for Russia, he said. 
The budget could be approved only with predictable
prices for world hydrocarbon resources, the expert
noted. The development of the situation in Iraq cannot
be predicted, that's why "sharp, multiple fluctuations
- ups and downs - of oil prices" are possible, Ivashov
said. 
"The economy of such a state as Russia will not stand
this, of course," the colonel-general emphasised.  


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to