http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-11/19/content_12488980.htm


Xinhua News Agency
November 19, 2009


Venezuela rejects U.S. mediation in dispute with Colombia  
 
 
CARACAS: The Venezuelan government rejected on Wednesday a U.S. proposal to 
mediate in a dispute between Venezuela and Colombia over Colombia's military 
cooperation agreement with the United States. 

"The mediation proposal has a clear aim of distracting the attention of its 
primary responsibility in the crisis and it is rude for the people of the world 
who are aware of it," the Venezuelan Foreign Ministry said in a statement. 

The ministry said that the best way for the United States to collaborate on 
this issue is to stop intending to make Colombia an operational base for its 
regional strategy to dominate and control the countries in South America." 

Venezuela said that the agreement signed between the United States and Colombia 
on Oct. 30 this year allows a disproportionate military presence of U.S. troops 
in Colombian territory, and this brings uncertainty to the South American 
region. 

"These arguments (fight against drug trafficking and terrorism) are false and 
do not dissipate the doubt and questions, with the establishment of equipment 
for the electronic war, tasks of intelligence, military officers and staff of 
security contractor companies," the ministry added. 

According to the statement the real arguments of the United States is to 
threaten the left-wing governments in Latin America, despite the fact that the 
agreement does not include actions in other countries, neither prohibits them. 

Finally, the Foreign Ministry said the United States military presence in Iraq 
and at the Colombian border with Ecuador has violated the Charter of the United 
Nations and other aspects of international law. 
===========================
Stop NATO
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopnato

Blog site:
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/
 
To subscribe, send an e-mail to:
[email protected]
or
[email protected]

Daily digest option available.
==============================




Reply via email to