On Aug 14, 2008, at 1:24 AM, Ned Gill wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:16:50 +0100, Terence Parr > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> is this the issue? >> http://www.antlr.org:8888/browse/ANTLR-189 > > > Thanks for the quick reply. The examples there certainly look > similar, but I can't tell from the description if it's really the > same issue. > > Presuming it is that bug, am I right in thinking that I shouldn't > expect a fix any time soon? I'm willing to have a look myself, but I > get the impression that it requires a fairly major change. Are there > any work-arounds I could try?
Nothing will appear that soon I'm afraid. I'd suggest refactoring the rules. Ter _______________________________________________ antlr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.antlr.org:8080/mailman/listinfo/antlr-dev
