> Sam Harwell wrote: > > The CSharp3 runtime port doesn't include that class because it adds a > > dependency on StringTemplate. Instead, I included it in the C# port of > > StringTemplate, and it does have the changes you are referring to. The > > CSharp/CSharp2 targets have a separate assembly called > > Antlr.Utility.Tree(.dll) containing this class, which has not been > > updated. Johannes maintains those targets, but I know his dev machine is > > down so I can update the file if he needs me to. > > > > > I think that it would be trivial to put it back in without a string > template dependency to be honest. I don't have string template in the C > version for instance. But, whichever way seems best :-)
What's your suggestion for doing so? Using object as type? Johannes > > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > antlr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-dev -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01 _______________________________________________ antlr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-dev
