Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've tried to find the source repository for antlr code and it looks > like you guys use closed Perforce repo. Is it true? > > It sounds kinda wrong to me that open-source project uses closed repo. > Some people (like me) start learn project internals from watching what > is cooking in it's repository. Also it is quire difficult to find > contributors for the project that does not have easy way to get latest > sources. > > Personally I think that Git (or some other distributed SCM) is the > best choice for open-source projects. Do you guys have any plans to > migrate to it? If no - then I can understand it. But in this case are > you interested in Git-mirror on github for your project? I could take > care of it and install cron-job that replicates it there. What do you > think? I just need read-only access to the repo. > Perforce outranks all the ones you mention by yards as far as most developers who use it are concerned (well, me at least ;-). However, to get a perforce account, you only have to ask. I agree that the perforce people not wanting an open read-only login is a bit of a pain and maybe we should ask them why they want this.
Also, you can follow the commits on fisheye: http://fisheye2.atlassian.com/browse/antlr which will give you an RSS feed as well. Jim _______________________________________________ antlr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-dev
