|
Thank you, I wasn't aware of any such thing as nested rewrites. Manfred On 09/06/10 18:20, Jim Idle wrote: I have never seen a case whereby the second part of your tree cannot be moved to another rule, but I will believe it is possible. Anyway, you just need to use rewrite rules rather than annotating the tokens with tree construction.->^(X ^(Y other)) And do not use 'Literals' in your parser/tree parser, make real lexer tokens. Jim-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Manfred Wölfel Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 7:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [antlr-dev] Nested trees Is there a way to make a sequence 'X'^ ('Y'^ other) yield a tree like (X (Y other)) instead of just Y? Because whenever it encounters ^ it makes the token root of a new tree forgetting about the past. The above mentioned code is straightforward generated from a different language. So it's hard to move the code in brackets into a separate ruleor userewrite rules._______________________________________________ antlr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-dev --
 Wilhelm-Külz-Str. 26, D-99423 Weimar Tel. (03643) 748500 Fax (03643) 748502 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Manfred Wölfel Amtsgericht: D-07745 Jena (HRB 500921) Umsatzsteuer-Id.: DE251702442 |
<<attachment: mail.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ antlr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-dev
