Sounds like a bug in either AW or the version of the ANTLR tool you're using. All but one of my grammars works like your original one without any problems. The last uses a hash table for keywords because it's in a speed-critical area.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcin Rzeznicki Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Lexer and Java keywords What's interesting - I checked the original Java grammar downloaded from ANTLR's web page, ANTLRWorks reports errors about tokens never matched as well. Huh? -- Greetings Marcin Rzeźnicki List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
