On Jan 19, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Scott Stanchfield wrote: >> i was thinking something like arbitrary code in some simple imperative >> language and then any call to @foo() or whatever would call foo in the >> target language. > > The thing I'd worry about would be feature creep in that language. > Everyone would want "just one more feature" so it could better support > their target language. You'd need to nail down that simple language so > the generators for it could be written - if any new features were > added all generators would be hit.
yeah, a real danger. > ANTLRScript? (shudder) i like! good idea. Ter List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
