On 3/11/2010 10:27 AM, Terence Parr wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Gerald Rosenberg wrote:
>
>    
>> Given an actual AST structure of
>>
>>          ^(ROOT ^(PACKAGE ^(PACKAGENAME ID+)))
>>
>> this tree pattern rule works as expected
>>
>>          package : ^(PACKAGE ^(PACKAGENAME id+=ID+)) ;
>>
>> and this works
>>
>>          package : PACKAGE ;
>>      
> that would only work as start rule i think.
>    
Well, it does work as a non-start rule, even if not intended.
>> However, this rule does not
>>
>>          package : PACKAGE ^(PACKAGENAME id+=ID+) ;
>>
>> Seems that it generates code that expects a flat structure:
>>      
> that is a flat structure :)
>
> A B is flat A=PACKAGE B=^(...)
>    
 From that perspective, but the code gets confused on the DOWN token.  
It is looking for

A=PACKAGE B=PACKAGENAME

but is actually finding

A=PACKAGE B=DOWN


List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.

Reply via email to