In parser grammars, ANTLR generates some default error-recovery code that I don't override, because it's moderately good and better than bailing out on the first error.
However, for tree grammars I've seen ANTLR generate similar error-recovery code to try to recover from malformed trees. I override this as I've seen statements (that I absolutely agree with) that any kind of automatic recovery from walking a malformed tree is folly. With that said, why does ANTLR generate any kind of recovery code at all for this kind of grammar? Richard -- \o/ List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
