Gerald Rosenberg wrote:
>
>> Input: aaaaXXXXbbbb wwwXXX ddddYYYzzzz
>>
> How is XXXX guaranteed to be unambiguous with any other fragment of
> aaaaXXXXbbbb? That is, how can you be sure that a fragment like aaaX or
> XXXXb will never match a different start marker.
The data generating service guarantees it. (It escapes characters
if any complete marker substring happens to be in the data.)
> Is there a case
> distinction, as implied, or something more interesting? Is the
> distinction the same for the end marker?
No and no. The markers are strings like `prenames', `prenamee',
`surnames', etc. That's why I used that example in my original email.
Joachim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joachim Schrod Email: [email protected]
Roedermark, Germany
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
