Hang on - do you mean just straight forward tree parsers? That all works, so you grammar must be incorrect. It is the pattern searching stuff that is not implemeneted.
jim > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:antlr-interest- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan Lehotsky > Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 12:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Tree pattern matching in C target > > > I'm using the C target and had attempted to use the up/down matching code > and couldn't make it work. Since I was still in the prototyping stage, I didn't > spend much time trying to figure out why it didn't work. Never thought of > the possibility that it hadn't been implemented. > > It would be a good thing to at least document the absence of this model. > > > > From: "Jim Idle" <[email protected]> > > Date: October 3, 2010 12:34:19 PM EDT > > To: <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Tree pattern matching in C target > > > > > > No - I have had zero demand for it to be honest. > > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest > Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your- > email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
