This is likely some error in your process. Other than the library headers being different, the generated code is exactly the same on all systems so that you can generate on one system and compile on all the others.
Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:antlr-interest- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael J Iatauro > Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 8:06 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [antlr-interest] C code generation differences on Windows > > Using ANTLR 3.1.3, I'm seeing some odd code generation differences in > the tree parser between Windows and *nix platforms, specifically having > to do with token names and IDs, which are causing my tree parser to > reject all incoming trees. There are several tokens missing in the > generated Windows header, and those missing tokens as well as several > others aren't given strings in the TreeTokenNames array in the C code. > Even more weirdly, the token that's always expected to be the root is > given different IDs, even between the parser and the tree parser, which > is causing the rejection. Has anybody else seen anything like this, or > have a sense of what's going on? > Thanks! > > ~MJI > > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest > Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your- > email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
