Hey Terrance,
tree grammar T;
a : some horrible mess of a RECURSIVE rule;
b : B ;
tree grammar U;
import T;
a : {pre action} T.a {post action}; // <-- wants to be able to refer
to super rule
It wouldn't be enough to just expose the super rule T.a.
In the generated walker A_T the rule 'a' would need to call the delegators.a().
> ANTLR technically doesn't expose x.y syntax to the user and so I didn't
> recognize the fact that you invoked the super rule. It extracted only those
> rules from your super grammar that it needed. It does this so that you can
> fill up libraries of grammars with rules and then pick out which ones you
> want without bloating your generated code.
Thanks for raising the issue.
Based on my bias ("Composite Tree Grammars are things of beauty") I
would hope for more than a minor ;-)
How do I get a login the JIRA so that I can follow issues?
> That said, I am adding an improvement request for consideration.
>
> http://www.antlr.org/jira/browse/ANTLR-452
Sorry, I can't parse this. Are you saying that you would like to
removed imports from ANTLR?
> I'd like to retract or how ANTLR it handles imports anyway.
Regards
Gary
P.S. is there any reason for ANTLR over Antlr | AntLR | AntLr | antlr etc.
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
