Hi John,
> Have you tried: > > | (ID GETS) => ID GETS e=expr (s=SEMI)? -> ^(GETS ID $e $s?) > > is the semicolon really necessary in the tree? (e.g. does the presence > of the semicolon actually change the meaning of of the statement?) > Exactly my thought after I sent my previous e-mail! > perhaps: > > | (ID GETS) => ID GETS^ expr SEMI!? > Or the equivalent rewrite rule: (ID GETS) => ID GETS expr SEMI? -> ^(GETS ID expr) Regards, Bart. > Hope this helps... > -jbb > > > > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest > Unsubscribe: > http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
